Questions and Answers : Unix/Linux : computation errors
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
New member Send message Joined: 21 Oct 25 Posts: 2 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
Hey Getting computation errors with the "10_Spacious@home 1.00" app on Linux Mint 22.2 |
|
New member Send message Joined: 21 Oct 25 Posts: 8 Credit: 315,000 RAC: 27,679 |
GLIBC_2.36 is required by the app. Devs, is it NEEDED to perform the work? And even with PCs that have it get this: <core_client_version>8.2.5</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 206 (0xce, -50)</message> <stderr_txt> 2025-10-21 04:42:00 (112075): wrapper (8.1.26018): starting Unrecognized option -cpu_time Options: --nthreads N --device N --sporadic --trickle X --version --use_tstp 2025-10-21 04:42:00 (112075): called boinc_finish(206) </stderr_txt> ]]> |
|
New member Send message Joined: 20 Oct 25 Posts: 4 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
fixed, i hope |
|
New member Send message Joined: 21 Oct 25 Posts: 8 Credit: 315,000 RAC: 27,679 |
First batch is completing at just over 3hr on a 7945HX for 200 credit each. Both errors are gone. Thanks! |
|
New member Send message Joined: 20 Oct 25 Posts: 10 Credit: 65,400 RAC: 5,605 |
Still getting errors, running to 100% stay there then fail. Some work units have been given credits, even failed ones, but this has not been transferred to the Host Total which still says Zero Also that credit has not been transferred to the overall total which means that I still can't create a Team as it says I have no credit. Thanks for your efforts Conan |
|
New member Send message Joined: 21 Oct 25 Posts: 2 Credit: 0 RAC: 0 |
In reply to Przemysław Bartczak's message of 21 Oct 2025: fixed, i hope better now thanks |
|
New member Send message Joined: 21 Oct 25 Posts: 8 Credit: 315,000 RAC: 27,679 |
In reply to Conan's message of 22 Oct 2025: Still getting errors, running to 100% stay there then fail. Should say which errors as they don't match above. You're getting 197 (0x000000C5) EXIT_TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED at 9,271 seconds. Probably because the project thinks the task should complete in time with those really high benchmarks. Your 7945 is 3x mine although mine is not 3D yours is as high as my 9950X. My 5950Xs complete OK in over 3 hr. |
|
New member Send message Joined: 20 Oct 25 Posts: 10 Credit: 65,400 RAC: 5,605 |
In reply to mmonnin's message of 22 Oct 2025: In reply to Conan's message of 22 Oct 2025: That error was from running the first batch of work units, I have aborted those now and am awaiting fresh work The benchmarks are as per BOINC, nothing to do with me. They don't affect a fixed credit project such as this. Conan |
©2025 SPACIOUS (Science PlAtform Cloud Infrastructure for Outsize Usage
Scenarios)
